Published daily by the Lowy Institute

David Cameron didn't always think the EU was essential to peace

David Cameron didn't always think the EU was essential to peace
Published 10 May 2016   Follow @SamRoggeveen

Here's David Cameron yesterday in a major speech on the Brexit referendum (my emphasis):

It’s barely been 20 years since war in the Balkans and genocide on our continent in Srebrenica. In the last few years, we have seen tanks rolling into Georgia and Ukraine. And of this I am completely sure. The European Union has helped reconcile countries which were once at each others’ throats for decades. Britain has a fundamental national interest in maintaining common purpose in Europe to avoid future conflict between European countries.

But here he is in January 2013, when he launched the referendum process:

What Churchill described as the twin marauders of war and tyranny have been almost entirely banished from our continent. Today, hundreds of millions dwell in freedom, from the Baltic to the Adriatic, from the Western Approaches to the Aegean. And while we must never take this for granted, the first purpose of the European Union – to secure peace – has been achieved and we should pay tribute to all those in the EU, alongside NATO, who made that happen. But today the main, over-riding purpose of the European Union is different: not to win peace, but to secure prosperity.

To be clear, Cameron hasn't changed his position on Brexit; he's always been against it. But those two quotes on the EU's role in maintaining peace in Europe are directly at odds. 

Photo: Getty Images



You may also be interested in